Lefora Free Forum
2 views

Teacher Change: Can they Do It? Is it worth it?

Page 1
posts 1–9 of 9
novice - member
16 posts

Identifying the change I am looking for is somewhat of a challenge.  I have several in mind but realize I need to keep the idea focused.  I’ve pick the change that is embedded most with my job and that is for teachers to make better use of technology in their classroom to engage learners and to use technology to raise achievement.

Each summer I offer for credit courses in which teachers can learn how to use the tools we have available in our school and district.  I guess the focus of these classes could be to lead the teachers to answer question #2 (Can I do it?) with an answer of “yes, I can use these tools.”  However, we know that there is a gap between a teacher knowing how to use a tool and using it effectively with students in a way that enhances learning.


There are other behaviors that teachers need to adapt to besides just knowing how to use the technology (actually some of my best integrators aren’t real high end users).  A more important behavior and/or believe is the attitude to trust students to use the tools effectively.  It comes down to control for some classroom teachers….can the students learn more from using the technology than from hearing them speak about the objectives at hand?  Unfortunately I think most teachers would opt towards the speaking or verbal presentation of the content at hand….even though we know this a turn off to many students.  With the emphasis of our state achievement tests and NCLB teachers are spending even more time on the rote tasks and lessons.

Question #1 (is it worth it?) is a much more difficult question to answer.  Will students be more engaged and enjoy coming to school more when they are able to use engaging technologies.  Yes, I believe they will and I don’t think teachers would dispute this either.  However, raising achievement on our state tests is what really matters to the district’s administrators and I certainly understand that.  So the question becomes will a teacher take a chance with tools they know engage students and use them to try to raise achievement rather than rely on the traditional methods of lecture and practice activities?  Sadly it is a risk that is too great for most teachers to take.  Ideally we could test our ideas to see if they work and we can raise achievement….but once again, there are no control groups of students and no one is going to volunteer their kids as a test group because any results that were less than stellar would reflect negatively on the teacher and actually impact the schools goal of AYP and Value Added measures.

It is at this point that stories become important.  I need to find teachers that will take smaller risks in the form of projects that wrap into them multiple curricular objectives as opposed to the often isolated ways the objectives are taught.  Through these smaller technology enhanced projects I can begin to build convincing stories of success.  Although each project may not be a success it can still serve the purpose of showing teachers what doesn’t work as well as that it is okay to learn from our mistakes. 

Sharing the stories as well as the message that we grow with successes and failures will have to be a part of the principal’s role in our building.  The principal as evaluator will need to assure teachers that growth and change takes time and hard work and that their risks and extra efforts will be rewarded not penalized. Over time we can add to our collection of stories as our experience grows. 


Still “Is It Worth It” for teachers?  Doing something in a different way than they’ve done it in the past will require more effort and teachers will be going into somewhat unchartered territory which will make it even more uncomfortable for them.  Does teacher evaluation become a tool at some point to require change (even if at a somewhat slow rate)?  Does it become the principal’s job at some point to say based on the stories we know this works and we know that the students are more engaged SO you as teacher need to be teaching this way as well.  Does the principal need to find a way to make it NOT worth it to do it the old way?  At some point I believe admin does need to use teacher evaluation as a tool for behavior change.

novice - member
18 posts
In the summer credit courses you work with, do the teachers share stories (good and bad) of their own technology integration efforts?
novice - member
16 posts

Hi Greg-
I've never thought of them as stories per se but there is plenty of sharing in the classroom...both informal and formal. At the midpoint or a bit earlier in the class teachers are asked to share where they are headed as they asked to be working on a independent project at the same time they are learning the new content I present. They also present at the end of the class. However, the real power comes in the informal sharing. This is the sharing that happens between other people in the classroom who they just happen to be sitting beside. Teachers who have had success with the technology will definitely tell their coworkers that "if they can do it"...anyone can do it. I hear that message all the time when teachers get a chance to work on these tech projects together or just interact with each other as they are working on their own projects. I can tell them they can do it, but in some ways I don't have the same credibility as a classroom teacher. I'm the computer teacher so of course I can do it. ;)
The "is it worth it" discussions are hard to quantify in terms of how much was learned but teachers will talk up the fact that the students enjoyed the projects, software, tools or whatever it is and that they were more engaged. Without engagement or even sufficient levels of engagement can students truly learn?

novice - member
18 posts
You may already do this, but after reflecting on the discussion so far in our book study, as your class does their report outs, I'd be listening to see how many of the observations of student engagement get to student behaviors as opposed to student outcomes. Are the teachers you're working with talking about how students demonstrated targeted behaviors, or talking about how they demonstrated curriculum objectives. For example, do they talk about how a student developed a nice Powerpoint presentation about their project that included an embedded video clip, or do they talk about how the student spent an extra hour researching online help to determine how to embed the video clip in their work instead of just blowing it off.
novice - member
16 posts

Hi Greg-
You make a great point....but I'd have to say that it is not often that we get near the type of conversation you are visualizing. The class takes place during the summer and almost of the teacher discussion is geared towards teacher behaviors and teacher skills. I might try to "sell" the work involved in creating these projects as being great for student engagement levels...but for teachers it is much more about coming to the understanding of "I can do this" in terms of the newly learned tools/skills. In an ideal situation I would have a class during the school year that would last weeks, months and would involve more "field" work....as in "now try this with your kids and report out". However, in the past teachers did not want to make that kind of commitment.

regular - member
62 posts

I love the post.

On the question of can they do it, I would comment loudly YES!

On whether or not it is worth it an even louder YES!

We have to understand that we need to change what we are doing and not just do more.  That is the hard thing for teachers. The whole concept of change is a paradigm issue. We do not want to just change what we are doing in the classroom, but also how we are doing it. When we ask teachers to engage students in a performance task we often forget we need to "give them permission" not to do some of the other drill and practice activities they have done in the past. I took a compilation of semester test questions from a variety of assessments I had teachers turn in. I then gave the test I had constructed to the staff. We often joke about doing this, but I actually did it. I then asked the staff if they really felt they were successful adults, why didn't they pass. They had some very good conversation surrounding this question. I can also tell you, I did not make some of the more veteran traditionalists happy. I also pointed out that many of them did not engage in the activity as they saw no relevance to it. I then confronted several and asked what relevance they saw in a similar activity for students.  Although this was not a real pleasant day. I made a point.  I then went on to put the scantron forms in my office so staff had to come into my office to get them. You would be surprised as to how many moved away from forced choice assessment as a result.  Those who continued to use forced choice assessments atleast were encouraged to run an item analysis afterwards so they could at least be aware of what students were missing.

I also wonder if teachers would engage in formative assessment practices with students as they engage in performance tasks if the summative assessments would take far less time to score?  I can't imagine that engaging students in quality performance tasks, and routinely providing quality feedback can be any more work than correcting a bunch of busy work or drill and practice worksheets.  

Can we do this? Yes but that is not the only question we need to ask. What can we stop doing must be answered as well. Then "Is it worth it" will be a little easier to answer. To just do more on top of what we are already doing is not going to thrill anyone, myself included.  

 

__________________
David Keane
novice - member
18 posts
I know the work you're doing is required and pre-requisite, and adds value. When it comes to technology integration, teachers do have to gain that sense of "I can do this." But there is so much more potential for learning than I previously recognized. Getting teachers to the point of "I can do this" is not the end point... it's the starting point. It gets them in the game. I wonder how many of them will actually use their new found confidence to influence the learning behaviors of their students at some point down the road? I wonder if they will recognize they have a new and powerful tool (technology) with which to do this.
novice - member
16 posts

Reminds me of the quote at the beginning of chapter 2: "It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do , and THEN do your best" -- W. Edwards Deming

Many teachers I work with can literally do no more or give more time than they already are. The above quote (and David's above post) really helped me reframe the whole concept of what we do and the time we take to do it. I do think teachers are doing their best...however, are they doing what is right or best practice? That becomes the real question. Are we doing what we've always done just because that is our habit or the way we learned to do things? How much of what we do in the classroom is even still connected to what we believe about education and the values we associate with teaching and learning?

regular - member
62 posts

Excellent questions! I wonder if we can answer any of them for ourselves or whether we need help from outside our profession. It makes me think about how effective advisory committees of non-teachers can be when looking at vocational programs.  Why aren't we using these for adademic programs as well? If anyone does have a good model for this please let me know.

I love your quote from Deming and then your statement "Many teachers I work with can literally do no more or give more time than they already are" as I really believe this to be true about many of the teachers I work with as well.  Working hard is not the key unless we are working hard at the right things.

__________________
David Keane
Page 1
posts 1–9 of 9

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now