I wonder if it is possible to create profound vicarious experiences in schools for either teachers or students. It seems to me that the answer is a loud no--but I'm willing to rethink it with suggestions from you all. We're too hobbled by time, place, numbers, mental models, and a governing structure to make that happen.
And I wonder what stories we need to tell to change the minds of parents, policy makers, educators, and students. It seems to me that we surely don't experiment nearly enough to develop compelling stories. It's been my experience that great stories, when they do happen, are only shared with an insignificant number of people and the stories aren't the basis for new practice.
The the discussion of "Understanding" on page 58-59 was enlightening. Yet, verbal persuasion seems to be the coin of the realm in schools. We constantly talk at colleagues and students--rarely do conversations occur. I found a nifty little piece of advice in this:
Between what I think,
What I want to say,
What I believe I’m saying,
What I say,
What you want to hear,
What you hear,
What you believe you understand,
What you want to understand,
And what you understood,
There are at least 9 possibilities for misunderstanding.
Francois Garagnon, French jurist
My last comment for now is that motivation is so important. "Finding a way to encourage others to both understand and believe in a new point of view may not be enough to propel them into action. Individuals must actually care about what they believe ..." page 61 bottom. It's been my experience that many educators don't give a rip about what they believe. We hardly ever talk to one another about it. Discussions about educational beliefs scarcely happen at all. Furthermore, the construct of "school"--the context--is one that says to educators, "I don't care what you think or what your values are. Teach the kid."