I really think the last paragraph of your post sparked something for me. I am not so sure that if we don't make some very needed changes schools as we know them may very well go away. There are more and more virtual options for schooling that are being accessed regularly. I think colleges may see the effects before k-12 systems. They may already be feeling the effects. They certainly have done more in the past few years to make access easier for their students and tailor programs towards their needs than what has been done in k-12 schools. I think the slowest to respond from what I have seen in my adult years has been high schools. Elementary schools, in many cases, have done some great things in terms of change. I have heard the saying that elementary teachers care about their kids, middle school teachers care about eachother, high school teachers care about their subjects and (please don;t take offense) professors care about their own little personal. research project.
We are the influencers.As the book says, if we use our skills effectively, we have the power to change everything.
Skip, doesn't this conversation remind of the point Clay Shirky made in Here Comes Everybody. He was talking about Scribes and how the end came for them via the printing press. They didn't know, and they actually argued against the printing press. Sort or like teachers arguing against virtual education. It's already here, it already happened. So, figure out how to be a part of it or fade away. That's the choice, whether teachers, unions, etc. agree or support it.
That train has left the station.
My next comment is really more sarcasm than anything. I think I have a social studies teacher in the last school I taught in that was unaware that being a scribe was no longer a career option. His idea of a lesson was kids copying what he had written on an overhead into a notebook he than spent time ensuring reflected exactly what he had written. I tried to explain to him that we now had photocopy machines so this was no longer a real marketable skill, but he insisted that this was an effective way of teaching. What was remarkable was the fact that he made very few comments duing many of these sessions. I was pleased when he decided to seek the greener pastures of retirement, but saddened knowing that he had sucked the passion from learning from countless students throughout his career.
Frankly, I think education reformers have failed to offer a coherent alternative to the current system. I think charter schools are a great opportunity for experiementation and offer many children great opportunities to learn. I also think that their success lies in their limited application. The forces that resist change, including most parents, are able to rest peacefully knowing that no one is going to try anything silly at their child's school.
I am sounding pessimistic, but I do believe that we have the power to influence change. I just wonder if we can influence change without a detailed vision of what our end goal is--something more tangible than "success for all". Does each person in this discussion group have a detailed idea of what education should be? How similar are our ideas at the implementation level? If we do agree, how do we communicate our vision to others? If we don't agree, how can we expect anyone else to listen to us?
This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts
It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member